Skip to content

Japanese companies adopt AI technology at a slow pace

Despite a growing imperative to tackle labour shortages, low productivity, and demographic decline, Japan’s corporate sector remains well behind its global counterparts in adopting artificial intelligence in the workplace. New findings reveal a strong and persistent hesitancy toward workplace AI, even as the government steps up efforts to encourage its use.

Japan lags global leaders in workplace AI implementation

Findings from an OECD report published at the end of last year show that a mere 8.4% of workers in Japan use AI in their day-to-day roles. This sharply contrasts with 50% of workers in the US and 32% in the UK, according to separate data sources. Elsewhere in Asia, Singapore stands out, with 56% of employees reportedly engaging with AI “multiple times a week,” making it that region’s leader in workplace AI adoption after the United Arab Emirates, as shown by industry reports.

This sluggish uptake is unfolding as Japan faces urgent calls to enhance productivity, a situation made worse by an aging and shrinking population. The G7’s latest figures place Japan at the bottom for productivity, according to a UK research briefing.

Cultural and corporate caution holding back rapid adoption

Industry experts cite cultural attitudes as a major barrier to swift AI integration in Japanese companies. According to Austin Xu, co-founder of the US-based firm Kuse AI, Japanese businesses are particularly averse to mistakes and risk, stating, “Tolerance for AI mistakes is close to zero, especially in anything client facing.” Xu, who recently extended his business into Japan, observes a strong demand among local firms for comprehensive proof before they commit to AI for essential business functions.

Parrisa Haghirian, an international management professor at Kyoto University of Advanced Science, emphasizes that Japan’s “process and consensus culture” impedes disruptive technological changes like AI adoption, starkly contrasting with the entrepreneurial mindset prevalent in the US. Haghirian notes that, as a result, AI in the Japanese context is generally limited to low-risk uses such as compiling documents, summarizing content, and collecting information, while critical decision-making tasks remain largely untouched.

Certain fields, such as healthcare, exemplify particularly slow progress. Some hospitals continue to rely on paper rather than digital systems; one staff member described the pace of technological advancement as akin to “the Stone Age.”

Government initiatives meet structural resistance

To counteract the nation’s lag, Japanese policymakers have prioritized AI adoption through legislation. In 2023, the AI Promotion Act was passed (read more here), promising a favorable climate for AI development via minimal regulation. Officials have publicly committed to transforming Japan into “the world’s most-friendly country for developing and utilizing AI,” envisioning a boost in productivity across industries.

Statistics from Japan’s Ministry of Finance claim that 75% of businesses have now introduced some version of AI, marking a substantial increase from the 11% reported five years ago (see report). Nonetheless, this metric has drawn criticism, as it often covers companies where only a few individuals use AI tools, and the scale of implementation tends to be minimal.

Skills shortages and aging infrastructure are also key challenges. Professor Yasushi Ogasawara of Meiji University highlights the workforce’s limited technical proficiency and lagging digital literacy, despite widespread use of digital devices. A recent survey projects a deficit approaching 800,000 IT professionals by 2030. Additionally, around 60% of the country’s corporate IT systems are over two decades old, further complicating widespread AI integration.

Many organizations also appear reluctant to adopt changes that could jeopardize employment, typically prioritizing workforce stability over introducing technology that could make some roles obsolete. However, a handful of large corporations have started looking for graduates with expertise in AI, indicating a slow but emerging change in hiring practices.

Gradual progress but major transformation remains elusive

Some established companies are beginning to act, such as trading giant Kanematsu, which has started bringing in new hires versed in AI. Uta Yamaguchi, who began working there in April, uses AI routinely for composing emails and generating meeting summaries. Still, she notes that the kind of multifaceted, highly autonomous AI often integrated in US workplaces is uncommon in Japan.

Most analysts see broad reform as a major challenge. According to Ogasawara, “Japanese society expects painless reform, so drastic change is difficult, to say the least.” Despite government advocacy and modest headway, substantial shifts in AI adoption rates may take time—raising concerns that Japan’s economy could suffer further should these advances remain limited.