Skip to content

FlightAware files lawsuit against Kalshi over flight prediction markets

Kalshi is facing a lawsuit from FlightAware, which contends that the prediction market unlawfully utilized its proprietary data to facilitate bets on U.S. flight cancellations, maintaining use of FlightAware’s branding despite instructions to discontinue.

This case has sparked a legal battle centered on the use of exclusive flight information in gambling contracts, highlighting potential issues regarding both data rights and aviation risk.

Kalshi Accused by FlightAware of Misusing Flight Data

In its filed complaint, FlightAware alleges that Kalshi, a major prediction market operator, incorporated both its flight data and branding on a platform where users could bet specifically on U.S. flight cancellation numbers and statistics at particular airports. The option to engage in these wagers on Kalshi was introduced about one month ago.

According to the filing, Kalshi used FlightAware’s trademark and data visibly on its website despite lacking a license or agreement, and, following explicit requests from FlightAware to stop, allegedly continued featuring FlightAware’s marks and data in connection with its wagering services.

The legal documents also indicate that Kalshi did not inform FlightAware of its intention to resolve bets using this proprietary data. FlightAware claims it only became aware of the existence of Kalshi’s flight cancellation markets after the launch attracted media attention.

Wider Issues in Prediction Markets and Associated Safety Risks

Sites like Kalshi and its competitor Polymarket are known for enabling users to stake money on a wide range of real-world events—including political races and entertainment happenings. Nonetheless, the sector has drawn criticism over possible market manipulation, with concerns raised despite prohibitions against insider trading.

For example, on Polymarket, one user reportedly placed a $32,000 bet predicting the ousting of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro by January’s end, ultimately collecting $400,000 after a last-minute U.S. military intervention. Another incident saw a White House teleprompter operator suspected of leveraging nonpublic presidential schedule information to secure winnings of over $100,000 through wagers on Kalshi.

Within its complaint, FlightAware emphasizes that using flight data in gambling could incentivize sabotage or manipulation targeting flight schedules, thereby presenting a serious risk to both passengers and airport personnel due to the potential to influence outcomes for betting advantage.

Relief Sought and Case Outlook

FlightAware is seeking a jury trial as part of its lawsuit, though the company has yet to specify an exact sum for damages. The proceedings are expected to address significant questions over prediction market regulation, proprietary data safeguards, and public safety issues tied to such betting offerings.